cstutoringcenter.com logo
E-mail:Password:

Become a premier member today to gain access to exclusive
member benefits! Just $5.00 to join FOR LIFE!







Integration by Partial Fractions

Register or log in today to rate this tutorial!
Current ranking: / 5 stars with 1 votes.


Topics
CASE 1: Linear factors in the denominator.
CASE 2: Quadratic factors in the denominator.
Examples
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3

Now we are in to a section of integration that many people enjoy doing since it does not really require a lot of messy calulus work. It involves a lot of algebra (but I'm sure you are a pro at that already!). It is the method of integration by partial fractions. This method involves a ratio of polynomials as seen below:

part 1

where P and Q are polynomials. Again, if the degree of P is larger than the degree of Q, we are to use long divison to get it into a form we can work with (though working with partial fractions, this will not happen that frequently).

When expanding the terms for the partial fractions, we must know that the corresponding numerator must be less than the denominator. To show this, we only have two cases for partial fractions:

part 2

For this technique, there are two cases that can occur:

CASE 1: Linear factors in the denominator.

For each term in the denominator of the form (ax + b)n there will be n partial fractions. An example of this will be the following:

part 3

Notice that each of the terms in the denominator are linear factors so the numerators in the expansion will be constant terms (A, B, C ...). And also notice that the (x+2) term is repeated twice. This is because the exponent in the original denominator tells you how many times that term will appear in the expansion. It always starts from its lowest power and proceeds to its highest when expanding the terms. So if the power was 4, there will be (x+2), (x+2)2 , (x+2)3 , (x+2)4 and so on.

More generally, the partial fraction expansion can look like:

part 4

CASE 2: Quadratic factors in the denominator.

For each term in the denominator that is of the form (ax2 + bx + c)m there will be m partial fractions. An example of this is the following:

part 5

Similar to case 1, you are making sure that each term in the expansion has a numerator that is less than the denominator and also that each term in the original denominator is represented the correct number of times. Observe in the above expansion that the final two terms of the expansion have a linear numerator because their denominator is quadratic.

More generally, the partial fraction expansion can look like:

part 6

Example 1

example 1a

Easily enough, the denomiator is already factored so this is an example of case 1 above. We find the partial fraction expansion for the term in the integral to be:

example 1b

But now we need to solve for A, B and C. We cannot simply leave it like that as a final answer. So the technique is to multiply by the LCD of the original fraction on both sides to get a term where you can plug in values to solve for A,B and C. Upon multiplying it out, we get the following term:

example 1c

Now, there are three ways of solving this equation above; the first is to plug in appropriate values of x to eliminate certain terms to solve for A,B and C; the second way is to use a system of equations and the third way is to perhaps use a combination of both (if you have a lot of terms to solve for, the third way is quite useful). For the purpose of this example, we will use the first method which is to plug in appropriate values of x.

example 1d

And we find that C must equal 3.

example 1e

And we find that A must equal 1.

example 1f

And we conclude that B must equal -1. So now, the known values of A,B and C are A = 1, B = -1, C = 3. Now, the integral will become:

example 1g

We can rewrite the integral on the right as the integral term by term:

example 1h

Now, evaluate the right integrals and solve for your final answer of:

example 1i

Example 2

example 2a

First, we notice that the denominator is not in factored form so we must factor the denominator to get the following integral:

example 2b

The partial fraction expansion will produce the following:

example 2c

Multiply by the LCD on both sides to get the equation:

example 2d

Be sure to multiply out on the right side of the equation and group the like terms to get:

example 2e

We can now solve this by the systems of equations:

example 2f

It is immediately obvious that B will equal -2 (the last equation). Now take that and plug into the second equation above:

example 2g

And we see that A will equal -2 as well. Now take that value of A and place it in the first equation above:

example 2h

So we see that C will equal 2 to make that equation equal to 0. The values for A, B and C are: A = -2, B = -2, C = 2. Now the integral will become:

example 2i

Let's take a moment to observe the first integral on the right side above. Here is a way to solve this integral: you may split the integral into the following:

example 2j

This is perfectly legal as it is seen in algebra when dealing with fractions and LCDs. Now piece these parts together with the other piece on the right to get:

example 2k

Solve each integral to get a final answer of:

example 2l

Example 3

example 3a

This is an integral of case 2 above with the quadratic term in the denominator unfactorable. We get the partial fraction expansion of:

example 3b

Next, we get the following equation to work with:

example 3c

The below is optional because the A,B and C can be found without this additional expansion:

example 3d

Either way, we can solve this by choosing appropriate values for x in the equation.

example 3e

We see that A must be 1.

example 3f

We can see that C must be 3.

example 3g

We can see that B must be 2. The values for A, B and C are: A = 1, B = 2, C = 3. Now plug in to the integral and solve accordingly.

example 3h

The leftmost integral is simply an ln. Observing the rightmost integral, we can see that it is made up of an ln but not quite so obviously. It requires some manipulation. Observe the manipulation below:

example 3i

We can now split the integral as we did in the previous example to get:

example 3j

The first of these is an ln because the derivative of the bottom is the numerator (2x + 2) and the right integral above needs to be done by completing the square (yes, none of the previously learned techniques go away!!!). Here is that integral:

example 3k

Putting all the pieces together, we get the following answer:

example 3l

You can see that this problem consisted of numerous techniques and manipulations and was a more difficult problem. Doing more integrals by partial fractions will certainly help you keep sharp on the previously learned techniques.